The smell of a fresh new book. Time for some reading!
We should do motorcycle maintenance for a study group sometime. Itâs on my to read list. Perhaps in 2019. Enjoy!
Yes, Iâve heard good things about it, and am lacking in my understanding of Eastern thinking.
Turns out Origins and History of Consciousness is a JBP recommended text:
However, as we have all these other books already lined up (JBPâs recommended reading order) itâll get plugged on say March 2020.
We can do motorcycle maintenance sooner, as it wonât follow the usual two month cycle. Currently, we are doing it like so: every 2 months a jbp recommended book, and the month inbetween will be a community recommended book - for instance, end of this month will be Taoism (JBP Community recommended), end of next month will be Ordinary Men (JBP recommended)
Unfortunately, @JohnBuck, there isnât too much Eastern insight within ZATAOMM, and such as there is it is filtered through Pirsigâs analytical bedrock, but the gist of the theme is perfectly aligned with McGilchristâs analysis of hemispherical lateralization. Pirsigâs âRomanticâ vs âClassicalâ distinction is essentially his left hemispherical acknowledgement of the leftâs inability to create quality (value). Itâs the Hume/Harris bootstrapping problem of value from facts. And in this sense, it approaches the equally dichotomous division between East and West perspectives. But above all, it is beautifully written, by a genius suffering from schizophrenia. I place it among the highest of my pleasurable reads in philosophical texts.
Neumann is Jungâs torch-bearing student, and is equally as dense. But the profundity is obvious. You donât need a book club to discuss Neumann or Jung, you need a book decadal-chunk-of-your-life-club.
Having read both, Iâd say ZATOOMM is a better book. Itâs accessible, itâs interesting, and it gets to the point. Theyâre a bit different, one being philosophy and the other claiming to be science, but I think the philosophy one wins here. TOAHOC wasnât substantial enough, I didnât think. The ideas were big, but the support didnât seem to be there.