topic
https://discuss.jordanbpeterson.community/t/jordan-b-peterson-maps-of-meaning/108
Morality and religion as a mimicry, a replication of admirable heroes, later to be codified into ethics, based upon our inherited culture presuppositions. (so, to have a morality merely based upon rules or facts, theres a missing component of reason for motivation. There’s no admirable heroic figure worth emulating and achieving his riches.)
For groups to interact (such as in games) there is a needed Telos, the ethos, and the normative ability. When the normative ability is lowered to allow for more people to achieve the same telos, the ethos changes and loses it’s previous functionality, needing to be revamped with likely not as successful attainment of the telos.
Difference between a hero that is unrestrained by the morality of his culture, and the evil person?
There are those that have a hatred for the successful, hatred towards life, and others, and themselves, and act out according to those beliefs, in contempt.
The phenomenological God of Peterson, whereas Harris is unwilling to participate in this line of thinking because he’s only interested in the literal God existing or not.
Nietzsche’s point, that our natural assumptions of reactions to events are not the only possible outcome (you can say that a stove is hot and if I touch it I will be burned, and that is the obvious outcome, so the act is bad. But, I can certainly place my hand on the stove as an act of masculine tribal maturation, and this re-interpretation of all actions and events is possible)